DNS over HTTPS vs. TLS—Key Concepts, Implementation Guidelines, and Recommendations.
DNS queries are still transmitted in cleartext by default, exposing browsing activity to eavesdroppers on the network path. DoH and DoT fix that — but they approach encryption differently. Here’s what to know before implementing either.
Denton Chikura

The quick download:
DNS over HTTPS (DoH) and DNS over TLS (DoT) both encrypt DNS queries to prevent interception, but differ significantly in the port they use, how detectable they are to network administrators, and which environments they suit best.
-
Standard DNS sends queries in cleartext over UDP port 53, exposing browsing activity to network-level eavesdroppers. DoH and DoT both address this by encrypting the DNS channel using TLS.
-
DoT uses dedicated port 853, making encrypted DNS traffic identifiable and manageable by network administrators, a key advantage in enterprise environments that need DNS visibility and filtering.
-
Consider DNS over QUIC (DoQ) for improved latency while maintaining the security benefits of encrypted DNS
When you access a website, the padlock icon in your browser tells you whether the website you visit is secure. This is because your browser and the web server have agreed on an encryption mechanism before any data exchange is done between the two. This ensures that your communication with your bank or social media site remains secure over the Internet.
However, one traditionally overlooked prior step of communication is DNS resolution. The Domain Name System (DNS) functions like the Internet’s phone book, translating readable website names into numerical IP addresses. When you type a web address into your browser, it sends a DNS query through a chain of configured DNS servers to determine the associated destination IP address.
Communication with DNS servers is still mostly done in clear text, and malicious entities can eavesdrop on this information. In the following article, we discuss the new standards being implemented to address the privacy concerns related to the Domain Name System.
Summary of key DNS over HTTPS vs TLS concepts
| DNS over TLS | DNS over HTTPS | |
|---|---|---|
| How it works | The client directly encapsulates the DNS data into TLS. | The DNS communication is first prepared as an HTTP request and then transported using TLS. |
| Preferred use case | Where network visibility is required | Where privacy is a significant concern. |
| Performance | Comparatively faster than DoH | Comparatively slower than DoT. The difference in delay is minimal but is still there due to the additional protocol overhead of HTTPS. |
| Privacy | A lower level of privacy as DNS network traffic is visible. | Higher level of privacy as DNS is transported within HTTPS. |
| Censorship bypass | Potentially lower possibility of censorship bypass. | Higher level of censorship bypass. |
| Network Port | 853 | 443 |
Traditional DNS and its vulnerabilities
The DNS communications today are being done mostly on clear text channels. When your computer makes a DNS query, it shares two critical pieces of information, which raises privacy concerns—the QNAME, or the site you are trying to get to, and your source IP Address.
The QNAME is the starting point for DNS queries, representing the domain name or service being sought. Depending on the type of service or information requested, the DNS query seeks out different record types. For example,
- A record—direct IP address resolution
- MX record—email delivery
- SRV records—VoIP or directory services
Someone with network path access between your computer and the DNS resolver can tap into the network, capture your information, and gather your intent. For example, the attacker can determine if you are accessing a specific website, emailing, or requesting a specific service type.

To address such privacy issues, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has proposed improvements to the DNS standards by increasing encrypted transport mechanisms. The most notable standards proposed by the IETF for this purpose are DNS over HTTPS and DNS over TLS.
DNS over TLS
DNS over TLS (DoT) secures DNS queries by wrapping them in Transport Layer Security (TLS) encryption, a successor to Secure Socket Layer (SSL). The IETF specifies DNS over TLS in RFC 7858.
TLS and how it works
TLS uses both symmetric and asymmetric encryption mechanisms to secure data transfers. The process, explained below, is also called a TLS handshake.
- The client initiates a client Hello message to the server, which includes the highest TLS version the client supports.
- The server responds with a server hello message and the chosen TLS version.
- The client and the server agree on a shared secret that will be used to encrypt and decrypt data during the session.
- The server sends its digital certificate to the client, including the server’s public key, which a Certificate Authority (CA) trusts.
- The Client and the Server derive session keys from the shared secret.
These keys encrypt and decrypt data between the client and the server. The session key is discarded once the communication session is over.

How DNS over TLS works
Port 853 is the standard port designated for DoT services. DoT-capable DNS servers are configured to listen and accept connections from clients for incoming DNS queries on this port. A dedicated port helps distinguish DoT traffic from other network traffic types, allowing for easier management of encrypted DNS queries. For scenarios where network configurations require traffic routed through specific ports (like firewall traversal, policy enforcement, or other reasons), the client and server can mutually agree to use another port. Changing the default port requires reconfiguring both.
When the DNS client needs to resolve a domain name, it establishes a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) session with the DoT-capable DNS server on port 853. The process involves the TLS handshake, during which the client and server exchange cryptographic information. The client then passes on encrypted DNS queries to the server, which returns encrypted responses.
To increase the performance, the client can pipeline multiple queries to the DNS server in the same TLS session. This avoids the overhead of repeatedly establishing a TCP connection and then a TLS session.
The DoT traffic is encrypted over the wire, and its contents cannot be read, but this does not necessarily prevent all forms of DNS tracking by ISPs. It is still identifiable as DNS traffic as the client and server typically communicate over the specific port 853.
DNS over HTTPS
DNS over HTTPS (DoH) is a protocol that performs DNS resolution via the HTTPS protocol. This means that DNS queries are sent to the resolver using HTTPS as the transport layer, ensuring they are encrypted along with the rest of HTTPS traffic. The IETF specifies DNS over HTTPS (DoH) in RFC 8484.
How HTTPS works
The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is the primary communication protocol of the Internet. The protocol does not provide security by itself as its header and payload are human-readable. Its secure version (HTTPS) relies on TLS to secure data exchange over the public Internet.
When a client browser requests any webpage from a server, the client computer first establishes a TCP connection with the server and then a TLS session between the client and the server (as explained above). After the TLS handshake, the client browser uses the TLS session to encrypt the HTTP requests to the web server. The web server uses the same TLS session to respond with the required data.

How DNS over HTTPS work
DoH works like a standard HTTPS protocol over the same port 443, making DoH indistinguishable from regular HTTPS traffic over a network.
At the core of DoH operation is the specification of a URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) that points to the DoH server. This URI, such as https://dns.server.net/dns-query, is essentially the web address of the DoH service, and it specifies where the DNS queries should be directed within the server’s namespace.
End users can often configure the DoH URI within their browsers or DNS clients. Modern browsers like Firefox, Chrome, and Edge offer settings where users can enter the URI of their preferred DoH server based on criteria like privacy policies, performance, or jurisdiction. In organizational networks, network administrators configure DoH URIs to enforce specific DNS resolution policies. ISPs or DNS service providers can also automate the configuration of DoH URIs using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP).
Using the defined URI, the client can use the HTTP GET or POST method to resolve the required DNS query from the DoH server. The HTTP body represents the DNS request as a media type application/dns-message. The client and server exchange DNS requests and responses over a secure TLS connection.
Implementing DNS over HTTPS and DNS over TLS
Before selecting a public DoT or DoH resolver, one should understand the chosen service provider’s privacy and security policy. Although the DNS traffic would be encrypted between the end client and the DNS server, the DNS server would still be able to identify the client IP and record the queries being resolved by the client.
DNS providers supporting DoH and DoT
Following is a list of some well-known open resolvers that support DoT and DoH
| Provider | IP Address | TLS Port | DOH URL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudflare | 1.1.1.12606:4700:4700::1111 | 853 | https://cloudflare-dns.com/dns-query |
| Quad9 | 9.9.9.92620:fe::fe | 853 | https://dns.quad9.net/dns-query |
| 8.8.8.82001:4860:4860::8888 | 853 | https://dns.google/dns-query |
Operating systems supporting DoH and DoT
The DoT and DoH are relatively newer standards and require manual configurations at the client end in most cases to enable these protocols.
| Operating System | DoT | DoH | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apple macOS 11 (Big Sur and later) | Yes | Yes | Native support for both DoT and DoH in Network Preferences. |
| Apple iOS (14 and later) | Yes | Yes | Native support for both DoT and DoH is available through DNS profiles or apps. |
| Google Android (9 and later) | Yes (Limited) | Yes | Native support for DoT with limited DoH options in developer settings (Android 11 and later). |
| Windows 11 and Windows Server 2022 | Limited | Yes | Native support for DoH only. Limited DoT support might be available through third-party tools. |
| Linux Distributions (varies) | Yes | Yes | Support varies depending on distribution and configuration. Typically requires manual setup using tools like systemd-resolved. |
Browser support for DoH
| Browser | Version | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Firefox | Ver 62 onwards (since 2019) | https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-dns-over-https |
| Chrome | Ver 83 onwards (since 2020) | https://blog.chromium.org/2020/05/a-safer-and-more-private-browsing-DoH.html |
| Bromite | Ver 67.0.3396.88 | https://github.com/bromite/bromite/wiki/DNS-over-HTTPS |
Implement your own DoT and DoH server with PowerDNS DNSDIST
You can implement DoT and DoH for your organization using the PowerDNS DNSDIST application without changing existing DNS resolvers. DNSDIST is an open-source DNS load-balancer that can be deployed in front of any DNS resolver and can provide standard DNS, DoT, and DoH capability. PowerDNS provides a software repository for most common Linux distributions. The instructions for installing DNSDIST via repositories are available at the PowerDNS repo site.
After installation, the application needs to be configured. We can define multiple backend servers to load-balance DNS traffic and provide failover capability. Edit the file /etc/dnsdist/dnsdist.conf with the following configuration.
-- define downstream servers, aka backends
-- https://dnsdist.org/guides/downstreams.html
newServer("1.1.1.1")
newServer("2606:4700:4700::1111")
newServer("8.8.8.8")
newServer("2001:4860:4860::8888")
Next, we need to enable the listening service of DNSDIST to accept connections on standard DNS port 53. To enable DoT and DoH you need to provide a proper CA signed certificate and key. Add the following configurations to the DNSDIST configuration file.
-- accept plain DNS (Do53) queries on UDP/53 and TCP/53
addLocal("0.0.0.0:53")
-- accept DNS over TLS (DoT) queries on TCP/853
addTLSLocal('0.0.0.0:853', {"/etc/ssl/domain-cert.pem"}, {"/etc/ssl/domain-cert.key"})
-- accept DNS over HTTPS (DoH) queries on TCP/443
addDOHLocal("0.0.0.0:443", {"/etc/ssl/domain-cert.pem"}, {"/etc/ssl/domain-cert.key"}, "/dns-query")
After configuration, the DNSDIST service needs to be (re)started, and you will now have your own DoT and DoH resolver.
DNS over HTTPS vs. TLS
Both DoT and DoH have been designed to protect DNS traffic between client and DNS server from prying eyes over the public Internet. For this purpose, both rely on the security and encryption mechanisms of TLS. Also, both protocols run over the TCP transmission layer. However, the primary difference between the two is that:
- In DoT the client directly encapsulates the DNS data into TLS
- In DoH, the DNS communication is first prepared as an HTTP request and then transported using TLS.
Implementing DoT and DoH increases the latency in the DNS resolution process compared to unencrypted UDP DNS queries. In DoH, the additional step of encapsulating the DNS communication in HTTP and transporting it over TLS/TCP causes a slightly bigger delay than DoT.
Use cases
DoT is preferred in organizations where network visibility and control are required. DoT uses a dedicated port (853), which allows network administrators to monitor DNS network traffic. However, the DNS content is still invisible unless the organization implements its own DoT or DoH resolver.
DoH is preferred where the focus is on privacy. DoH utilizes the same port (443) as HTTPS traffic, effectively camouflaging DNS queries within web browsing activity. DoH can also facilitate users’ bypassing restrictions in regions that implement DNS-based censorship, as it can bypass restrictions on specific DNS resolvers.
It is also important to note that DoT and DoH have been designed primarily for the privacy of end users. This may cause challenges for organizations implementing DNS-based filtering for parental control or malware protection. Encryption makes the user’s DNS traffic invisible, and the organization loses the visibility and control it previously had.
Improving DNS over HTTPS and DNS over TLS
The following improvements are needed for both DoH and DoT
Latency
To improve the latency of DNS resolution and provide the same security and privacy features, a new protocol standard DNS over QUIC has been proposed in RFC 9250. The QUIC protocol uses the encryption capability of TLS 1.3 but utilizes UDP instead of TCP for more efficient transport layer communication. Additional multiplexing optimizations and improvements in TLS 1.3 further reduce the latency.
Multi-level security
The DoT and DoH protocols provide encryption and privacy for communication between the DNS client and DNS resolver. However, the communication between the DNS resolver and authoritative servers still works over standard unencrypted DNS protocol. An experimental RFC 9539 has been proposed, but there is no standard implementation yet.
The two protocols also cannot protect against other types of DNS threats like DNS spoofing or cache poisoning. For protection against such attacks, the DNS Security Extension (DNSSEC) has been standardized to provide data origin authentication and data integrity protection. DNSSEC adds digital signatures to the DNS responses which the clients can use to authenticate that data comes from an authentic zone and has not been modified in transit. DNSSEC however, does not encrypt the responses which remain in clear text while in transport and thus cannot act as an alternate to DoT/DoH.

Tracing
How quickly your DNS resolves for a user is their introduction to your brand. Tracing DNS issues back to the correct resolution level is usually a headache. LogicMonitor helps you quickly determine whether your DNS is at fault and at what level in the resolution chain the problem occurred. Regardless of the resolution level, you can pinpoint issues anywhere in your DNS hierarchy. You also gain instant access to DNS response times and network-level metrics – all without installing any agents.
Final thoughts
In the article, we have highlighted the privacy concerns related to the standard DNS resolution process and how the newer DoT and DoH protocols have been designed to address the challenges. Both protocols share an encryption layer but differ in the network visibility and level of privacy each provides.
They are relatively newer protocols than the original DNS standard, but their implementation is still not ubiquitous. Also, the DoT and DoH have some potential performance impact, which is being addressed in the even newer proposed protocol, DoQ.
CHAPTERS
NEWSLETTER
Subscribe to our newsletter
Get the latest blogs, whitepapers, eGuides, and more straight into your inbox.
SHARE
Implement encrypted DNS monitoring to maintain visibility while protecting privacy.
Whether you choose DoT or DoH, monitoring your DNS infrastructure remains critical for performance and security. LogicMonitor provides comprehensive DNS monitoring capabilities that help you track resolution times and identify issues across your entire DNS hierarchy.
FAQs
Can I use both DNS over TLS and DNS over HTTPS simultaneously in my organization?
Yes, you can implement both protocols simultaneously using solutions like PowerDNS DNSDIST, which can listen on both port 853 for DoT and port 443 for DoH. This allows different clients or applications to use their preferred protocol while maintaining centralized DNS management. However, you’ll need to configure separate listeners and ensure your certificates are properly configured for both services.
What happens to my existing DNS security tools when I implement DoT or DoH?
Traditional DNS security tools that rely on inspecting clear-text DNS traffic will lose visibility when you implement DoT or DoH. Organizations need to either implement their own DoT/DoH resolvers to maintain visibility, use DNS servers that provide logging capabilities, or deploy security solutions that can decrypt and inspect encrypted DNS traffic at designated inspection points.
How do I choose between implementing DoT versus DoH for my enterprise network?
Choose DoT if you need to maintain network visibility and control, as it uses a dedicated port (853) that’s easier to monitor and manage through firewalls. Choose DoH if privacy is your primary concern and you want to prevent DNS traffic from being distinguished from regular HTTPS traffic. DoT also offers slightly better performance due to lower protocol overhead.
What are the performance implications of switching from traditional DNS to encrypted DNS?
Both DoT and DoH introduce additional latency compared to traditional UDP-based DNS queries due to the TCP connection establishment and TLS handshake. DoH has slightly higher latency than DoT due to the additional HTTP protocol overhead. However, both protocols support connection reuse and query pipelining to minimize performance impact. For latency-sensitive applications, consider the emerging DNS over QUIC (DoQ) protocol, which uses UDP transport while maintaining encryption.
Denton Chikura is a technical writer and longtime observability advocate focused on helping site reliability engineers and engineering teams discover the tools and capabilities that strengthen internet resilience. He works at the intersection of monitoring, performance, and infrastructure to make complex systems more understandable and usable, bridging the gap between deep technical detail and real‑world operations. His goal is to help teams build faster, detect issues earlier, and recover smarter, ultimately making the internet a better, more reliable place for everyone.
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of LogicMonitor or its affiliates.
© LogicMonitor 2026 | All rights reserved. | All trademarks, trade names, service marks, and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
