Internet Performance Monitoring

Real-Time Detection of BGP Blackholing and Prefix Hijacks

Learn how an upstream provider accidentally blackholed live-streaming traffic and how external BGP monitoring detected the origin AS mismatch in real time.
4 min read
August 18, 2026
Denton Chikura
NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest blogs, whitepapers, eGuides, and more straight into your inbox.

SHARE

The quick download:

External BGP monitoring is the only reliable way to detect upstream blackholing before users are impacted.

  • Origin AS mismatch alerts caught an unauthorized /32 route injection that internal telemetry completely missed, restoring service within minutes of detection.

  • Automated DDoS mitigation systems can misidentify legitimate traffic spikes as attacks, silently dropping valid user traffic across entire regions.

  • BGP’s longest-prefix match rule means a single injected /32 overrides a legitimate /24, giving upstream providers outsized control over your reachability.

  • Deploy third-party route monitoring today to verify your prefixes are being routed as intended across all transit paths.


Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) remains the backbone of inter-domain routing on the Internet, but its fundamental trust model leaves it vulnerable to misconfigurations, hijacks, and blackholing. When these issues occur, they often go undetected by the impacted networks until users report degraded performance or service outages.

This post walks through a real-world incident in which a legitimate traffic spike led to an upstream provider mistakenly blackholing a critical IP address. The scenario illustrates how BGP blackholing can silently disrupt service and how external observability enables rapid diagnosis and resolution.

Understanding BGP blackholing

BGP blackholing is a commonly used DDoS mitigation tactic. A network under attack announces a more specific route for the targeted IP or subnet, directing that traffic to a null interface to prevent it from reaching the intended service infrastructure. While effective in protecting resources during volumetric attacks, this approach can inadvertently block legitimate traffic when applied too aggressively.

Here’s an example of how this plays out in practice.

AS2 creates BGP blackhole. No traffic reaching intended server.

In this case, the /24 prefix 1.0.0.0/24 was owned and announced by one autonomous system (AS1). A specific point-of-presence (PoP) within this prefix was responsible for live-streaming a global event. The virtual IP for this PoP, 1.0.0.100, saw a surge in traffic from viewers worldwide.

The traffic passed through an upstream provider (AS2), which monitored for DDoS patterns. Seeing the sudden spike, AS2’s automated mitigation system assumed the traffic was malicious. It responded by injecting a more specific /32 route for 1.0.0.100 into the global routing table and directed it to a null interface.

The effect was immediate: traffic destined for the live-streaming service was dropped silently by AS2, resulting in widespread loss of availability for users across multiple regions.

Read The Complete Guide to BGP Monitoring for a detailed exploration of BGP monitoring techniques and best practices.

Challenges in diagnosing upstream blackholing

From AS1’s perspective, the service infrastructure remained operational, and no anomalies were observed in internal telemetry. However, users couldn’t access the stream.

Why traditional monitoring misses upstream blackholing

Because the traffic was dropped before reaching AS1’s infrastructure, no logs or packet traces indicated a problem.

This is a common limitation when relying on internal monitoring alone. In upstream blackholing scenarios, routing changes happen outside of the origin network’s control. The only observable symptom may be an unexplained drop in traffic or availability.

The diagnostic challenge is further complicated by the specificity of the blackhole route. While the legitimate route for 1.0.0.0/24 remained active, the injected /32 for 1.0.0.100 took precedence due to BGP’s longest-prefix match rule, causing traffic to be rerouted and dropped at AS2.

Detecting origin AS mismatches and route hijacks

The incident was identified through external route monitoring that detected an origin AS mismatch: the /32 prefix was being originated by AS2 instead of the expected AS1. This deviation triggered an alert, which prompted further analysis of the BGP path and propagation behavior.

BGP alert for ASN origin mismatch

An inspection of the AS path confirmed that certain regions were receiving the incorrect /32 advertisement and routing traffic through AS2, which blackholed the packets. The blackhole route had global reachability in select geographies, explaining the outage pattern observed by users.

Mapping the propagation of the erroneous route helped identify the scope of the impact and enabled coordination with AS2 to withdraw the blackhole announcement. Once removed, traffic to 1.0.0.100 resumed normal routing, and the live-streaming service was restored.

BGP path, clearly identifying where traffic was split due to blackhole

Broader implications

This incident highlights the fragility of the global routing layer and the potential for automated systems to cause collateral damage, even when operating as designed. It also underscores the limitations of relying on internal data alone to understand end-to-end Internet performance.

Visibility into prefix propagation across the globe

External BGP monitoring allows operators to observe how their prefixes are being routed across the Internet and to detect anomalies such as:

  • Prefix hijacks by unintended or malicious ASes
  • Upstream blackholing through more-specific announcements
  • AS path divergence and propagation anomalies

This kind of visibility is critical for large-scale services that rely on third-party transit and upstream providers to reach global users. It’s also where a unified platform matters. LogicMonitor brings together infrastructure observability through LM Envision, Internet Performance Monitoring through Catchpoint, and AI-driven intelligence through Edwin AI, giving teams a single system to correlate internal metrics with external routing behavior and pinpoint issues faster.

Looking forward

BGP remains a powerful but fragile protocol, and incidents like this illustrate the importance of proactive, third-party observability into Internet routing. As automated mitigation systems become more prevalent, it’s increasingly important for network operators to verify not just whether their services are available, but whether their prefixes are being routed as intended.

Detect BGP blackholing and prefix hijacks before your users notice.

LogicMonitor delivers unified visibility into internal infrastructure and external routing behavior, so you can catch upstream anomalies in real time and resolve them faster.

FAQs

What is BGP blackholing and why does it cause outages?

BGP blackholing directs traffic for a targeted IP to a null interface, effectively dropping all packets. While designed to mitigate DDoS attacks, it can inadvertently block legitimate traffic when automated systems misidentify normal spikes as malicious activity, causing silent service outages.

Why can internal monitoring tools miss upstream BGP issues?

Internal monitoring only sees traffic that reaches your infrastructure. When an upstream provider injects a more-specific route and drops traffic before it arrives, your logs, metrics, and packet traces show nothing abnormal. Only external route monitoring can observe these changes.

How does external route monitoring detect a BGP prefix hijack?

External monitors compare the origin autonomous system (AS) of advertised prefixes against expected values. When a prefix appears with an unexpected origin AS, an alert fires. Operators can then inspect AS paths and propagation maps to confirm the hijack and coordinate withdrawal of the erroneous route.

Denton Chikura
By Denton Chikura
Technical Writer
Denton Chikura is a technical writer and longtime observability advocate focused on helping site reliability engineers and engineering teams discover the tools and capabilities that strengthen internet resilience. He works at the intersection of monitoring, performance, and infrastructure to make complex systems more understandable and usable, bridging the gap between deep technical detail and real‑world operations. His goal is to help teams build faster, detect issues earlier, and recover smarter, ultimately making the internet a better, more reliable place for everyone.
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of LogicMonitor or its affiliates.